


Genetically Modified Crops: What Do the Scientists Say?
During 2000 and 2001, Plant Physiology published a series of
Editor's Choice articles devoted to biotechnology and genetically
modified (GM) crops. Why did the Editors of the journal take this
initiative? In recent years, the media have increased the public's
awareness of the environmental and health dimensions of cultivating
and consuming GM crops, often uncritically reporting results of
controversial studies. Emotionally charged terms such as
"frankenfoods," "superweeds," and "genetic pollution" have entered the
discussion and the popular vocabulary.
We believe that it is critically important for plant scientists to be
actively involved in educating the public, including legislators,
about the scientific issues that involve GM technology. We have an
obligation to help people understand the reasoning behind scientific
research and genetic technology. As scientists, we need to consider
the complexity of issues involved from the points of view of history,
politics, culture, ecology, safety, environment, and business. Some of
our colleagues are actively involved in these educational processes,
and we have invited twelve of them to write essays expressing their
views on the many issues surrounding this debate. We wanted to put
into a broader framework our daily work in the laboratory and our
discussions with opponents of genetic modification of crop plants. In
some cases opponents of the technology have resorted to criminal
activities, resulting not only in destruction of field trials - often
of non-GM plants - but also in incidents of arson of research
facilities. Graduate students have had their materials destroyed as a
result of such activities. Many of our readers are in the "trenches"
of these confrontations, and we believe it is extremely important that
the voices of prominent scientists be heard, not only by the general
public and politicians, but also by plant biologists.
These articles are written mainly for scientists, and particularly for
our fellow plant biologists. We believe it is absolutely essential
that every plant biologist become educated about the broader issues of
food security, especially with respect to biotechnology, and that they
become proactive in educational activities at every level. There are
many widely held public misconceptions and much unfounded fear about
the safety of transgenic crops. Educating the public about the success
of biotechnology to date and its future promise will require a
commitment on the part of the entire community of plant biologists.
Natasha Raikhel, Editor-in-Chief of Plant Physiology
View the articles within the book:
Crop Biotechnology. Where Now?
Ben J. Miflin
The Genetically Modified Organism Conflict
Chris Somerville
Biotechnology and the Poor
Maarten J. Chrispeels
Ending World Hunger. The Promise of Biotechnology and the Threat of Antiscience Zealotry
Norman E. Borlaug
Genetically Modified Crops and Developing Countries
Luis R. Herrera-Estrella
The Population/Biodiversity Paradox. Agricultural Efficiency to Save Wilderness
Anthony J. Trewavas
Interpreting the Scientific Literature. Differences in the Scientific and Lay Communities
May R. Berenbaum
Golden Rice and Beyond
Ingo Potrykus
When Transgenes Wander, Should We Worry?
Norman C. Ellstrand
Genetic Engineering and the Allergy Issue
Bob B. Buchanan
The Genetically Modified Crop Debate in the Context of Agricultural Evolution
Channapatna S. Prakash
Agricultural Biotechnology for Africa. African Scientists and Farmers Must Feed Their Own People
Jesse Machuka
Feeding Ten Billion People. Three Views
James N. Siedow
Order the book of articles:
ORDER ONLINE
or
PRINT OUT AN ORDER FORM (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader) to mail or fax