Untitled Document
Contact Us    |   Register
SITE SEARCH
HOME
ONLINE COMMUNITY
MEMBERSHIP
MEETINGS & EVENTS
PUBLICATIONS/RESOURCES
CAREERS
GOVERNANCE
SECTIONS
AWARDS & FUNDING
EDUCATION & RESEARCH
PUBLIC AFFAIRS
EDUCATION FOUNDATION
ABOUT US


ASPB Newsletter - March/April 2008
Search All Articles     
     
PREVIOUS      |     TOC
March/April 2008
Volume 35, Number 2

OBITUARIES


Dov Koller

Dov Koller

With Dov Koller’s passing, plant biology lost a consummate plant physiologist. During the past several decades, plant biologists have increasingly turned to molecular tools to investigate important problems in plant biology. Indeed, many who didn’t fell by the wayside. Dov, however, was different: He was rightly convinced that there was still a huge amount to be learned from the whole plant, and he made a brilliant career based on that premise. Thus, we find paper after paper on seed germination, photoperiodism, photosynthesis, photorespiration, and gibberellin responses, all at the organism level.

Dov gradually began to focus his research on light-driven leaf movements, and indeed a huge portion of what we know about leaf movement came from his laboratory. He has left a legacy of more than 125 papers, many of them seminal.

I first learned of Dov Koller’s work from an article he cowrote in the Annual Review of Plant Physiology in 1962 entitled “Seed Germination.” This beautifully clear review provided an ideal introduction for teaching this material in my Stanford plant physiology class.

Though I had met Dov at various meetings, it was only when he came to Carnegie to spend a sabbatical in my laboratory that I learned what an incredibly ingenious experimenter he was. By this time, he was fully committed to studying the mechanism of solar tracking—the way in which many plants move their leaves to keep them at right angles to incident light to maximize photosynthesis.

Here are some of the questions he addressed: Are the photoreceptors oriented? If a leaf ends up facing the setting sun, what happens the next morning? Is it still facing west? (No; during the dark period it reorients to be facing the rising sun in the morning.) How fast can a leaf move in response to a change in the angle of incident light? Where are the photoreceptor molecules located? I remember arguing excitedly with him on one occasion about how a particular experiment should be done. We finally did the experiment his way, not mine, and it worked!

He never needed expensive equipment to address these and many other questions, but rather built some of the most remarkable contraptions himself from odd items he could salvage. For example, he mounted a lamp on a bicycle wheel, properly counterbalanced, so that he could move the wheel manually to change the angle of incident light striking a leaf at any rate he wished. This allowed him to demonstrate that a leaf of Lavatera cretica could move more than 40 degrees per hour, allowing it to catch the late afternoon sun following a storm.

He also built an ingenious device that would precisely simulate the angle of the sun throughout the day so that he could perform his experiments when all of the leaves were in the same, well-characterized state. It was his idea to hit a leaf with two light beams—one polarized in the plane of the main vein and the other at right angles to it—to see which, if either, would win the physiological tug of war. Naturally, he built the right device to perform that test and demonstrated that it is the former. As a result, he discovered the first case of oriented photoreceptors in higher plants. I still have on my desk the gadget he built to test whether there were significant differences in reflectivity for the two beams (an important control; there weren’t).

Dov was a wonderful collaborator. He was stimulating, full of ideas, and willing to spend extra time, sometimes late into the night, to have results ready for discussion the next day. He was also bursting with infectious enthusiasm for the science and rigorously applied the highest standards to the experiments and their interpretation. He always shared our enthusiasm when things were going well and encouraged us thoughtfully when they weren’t.

Remarkably, his scientific thinking remained sharp and perceptive until his death. Indeed, even while being treated for skin cancer using photodynamic therapy, he came up with the idea for an ingenious device to improve the treatment: Use LED-based traffic lights to provide the high-intensity red light needed to induce the photodynamic effect, but without burning the patient’s skin. Sadly, although Dov ordered the traffic lights from China and designed the device, he did not live to see it built or used. His doctor is now publishing the results of this successful idea in Dov’s final, posthumous paper.

Besides his scientific contributions, Dov was also a dedicated educator and mentor. He trained and nurtured many young people, raising them to prominent positions in science. He wrote several books to convey the concepts that he found so beautiful to his students and to a broader audience. His last manuscript is a summary on his life’s passion of how and why plants move, a successor to Darwin’s seminal book on the topic. We hope it will eventually see the light of day.

My wife Ann and I have many friends worldwide in the scientific community, but Dov and his wife Ditza were among the very closest. We treasure the time we could spend with them, both in and out of the laboratory. Dov’s passing leaves an aching, empty spot in our hearts and in those of many others. He will be sorely missed.

Winslow Briggs
Director Emeritus
Carnegie Institution of Washington

 


© Copyright American Society of Plant Biologists 2011-2012 (All Rights Reserved)